dvaidr
July 12th, 2010, 02:29 AM
I have an assembly made up of sub-assemblies, which costs approx £1.5M to build. Reliability Testing is required as specified by the customer, which includes a failure truncated test. This means that the assembly is destroyed in the process, which is obviously very costly.
Some time ago, I came across 'proof of testing' which could be used as a substitute for this type of test. Unfortunately, I have no further information. Is there an accepted methodology which can be used instead on destroying the assembly?
Some time ago, I came across 'proof of testing' which could be used as a substitute for this type of test. Unfortunately, I have no further information. Is there an accepted methodology which can be used instead on destroying the assembly?